Quarterly. Founder-written.
No drip.

A quarterly dispatch from the Verdict founders. Cryptographic evidence research, regulatory deadline tracking, and the field-tested patterns from real AI liability incidents — written for the General Counsel and CISO who would rather read it once than subscribe to a daily blog.

One-click unsubscribe in every issue · Your email is never shared · Founders read every reply

── Upcoming Issues ──

• No. 01

  Published Aug 20, 2026

  The Ninth Circuit Looked at Your Architecture. Your Insurer Is Next.

  A federal appeals court decided who acted by tracing where the code ran. Seven months earlier the standard liability form began excluding anything arising out of generative AI. Includes a line-by-line read of CG 40 47, CG 40 48, and CG 35 08.

• No. 02

  Planned

  FRE 707 Was Sent Back. FRE 902(14) Is Already Here.

  The Advisory Committee declined to advance proposed Rule 707 in May 2026 and held it for further study. Meanwhile the rules that already exist — 902(13) and 902(14) — are the ones your evidence will actually be tested against.

• No. 03

  Planned

  Article 12 After the Omnibus Delay

  High-risk logging obligations slipped to December 2027 under the Digital Omnibus. That is not a reprieve — it is an eighteen-month procurement window, and what you buy in it decides whether your logs survive challenge.